From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Oberlander

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 16, 2022
Civil Action 19-3689 (E.D. Pa. May. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-3689

05-16-2022

JEREMY BROWN, Petitioner, v. OBERLANDER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

CHAD F. KENNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition, response, and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Brown v. Oberlander

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 16, 2022
Civil Action 19-3689 (E.D. Pa. May. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. Oberlander

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY BROWN, Petitioner, v. OBERLANDER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 19-3689 (E.D. Pa. May. 16, 2022)