From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Mukasey

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 15, 2008
Civil Action No. 08 0738 (D.D.C. Apr. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08 0738.

April 15, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff's application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Minersville, Pennsylvania, seeks to compel the Attorney General to appoint an independent counsel to investigate "prosecutorial criminal misconduct by U.S. Department of Justice employees, and several U.S. Magistrate Judge, along with Clerks of Court," stemming from his alleged "illegal prosecution." Compl. at 1. The United States Attorney General has absolute discretion in deciding whether to investigate claims for possible criminal or civil prosecution. As a general rule applicable to the circumstances of this case, such decisions are not subject to judicial review. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480-81 (D.C. Cir. 1995). Besides, the independent counsel statute expired in 1999. See 28 U.S.C. § 599. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Brown v. Mukasey

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 15, 2008
Civil Action No. 08 0738 (D.D.C. Apr. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Emanuel Brown, Plaintiff, v. Michael Mukasey/Attorney General, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Apr 15, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08 0738 (D.D.C. Apr. 15, 2008)