Opinion
Civil Action No. 05-cv-02449-MJW-CBS.
February 22, 2006
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case was referred by Order of Reference Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), signed on February 17, 2006, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn and was assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on February 17, 2006.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Fed.R.Civ.P.72(a) and (b), it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge, entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on December 6, 2006, is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on March 2, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-502, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. No later than 5 days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order (in PDF format) in compliance with the newly established ECF Filing Procedures. An additional copy shall be provided to chambers by e-mail (in WordPerfect or Word format and as an attachment to the email) with the subject line proposed "Scheduling Order" to:Watanabe_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov.
Please remember that everyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
Atch 1
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER
When the court has set a scheduling conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 16.2, a scheduling order shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), no discovery shall be done by the parties until the parties meet and attempt to agree on a scheduling order. The rule 26(f) meeting shall be held at least 21 days before the proposed scheduling order is due to be tendered. The disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) shall be exchanged at or within 14 days after the rule 26(f) meeting. Do not file any disclosure statements with the court. In this case, the Court is aware that this case was set for a Scheduling Conference before Magistrate Judge Shaffer on February 24, 2006, and that Magistrate Judge Shaffer vacated his conference to allow the matter to be reset on Magistrate Judge Watanabe's docket. Counsel should have conducted this rule 26(f) meeting in preparation for Magistrate Judge Shaffer's conference.
Five days before the scheduling conference (see Fed.R.Civ.P. 6 for all computations of time), counsel are to tender a proposed scheduling order which shall include the signatures of counsel and pro se parties and shall provide for approval by the court as specified on the attached form. Counsel and pro se parties should try, in good faith, to agree upon matters covered in the scheduling order. Any area of disagreement should be set forth with a brief statement concerning the basis for the disagreement. The parties should expect that the court will make modifications in the proposed scheduling order and will want to discuss all issues affecting management of the case.
D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2 authorizes magistrates judges to exercise jurisdiction of civil matters upon the consent of the parties. If all parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, the "Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge" form and a proposed order of reference are to be filed promptly with the Clerk of the Court and the consent indicated in section 6. of the proposed scheduling order. Note that D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2D. provides, in part: "Written consent to proceed before a magistrate judge must be filed no later than ten days after the discovery cut-off date. In cases not requiring discovery, the parties shall have 40 days from the filing of the last responsive pleading to file their unanimous consent." Refer to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2F. if all parties have not been served or in the event additional parties are added after the scheduling conference.
Listed on the following pages is the format for the proposed scheduling order. The bracketed and italicized information on the form explains what the court expects. Scheduling orders shall be double-spaced in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1E., even though the instructions in the following format for the proposed scheduling order are single-spaced.
(Rev. 04/15/02)
Atch 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. __________________
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Defendant(s).
SCHEDULING ORDER 1. DATE OF CONFERENCE AND APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
[Provide the date of the conference and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of counsel for each party and each pro se party. Identify by name the party represented by each counsel.]
2. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS AND DEFENSES
a. Plaintiff(s): b. Defendant(s): c. Other Parties: [Provide concise statements of all claims or defenses. Each party, in light of formal or informal discovery undertaken thus far, should take special care to eliminate frivolous claims or defenses. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(c)(1), 11. Do not summarize the pleadings. Statements such as "defendant denies the material allegations of the complaint" are not acceptable.]3. UNDISPUTED FACTS
The following facts are undisputed: [When the parties have their rule 26(f) meeting, they should make a good-faith attempt to determine which facts are not in dispute.]4. COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES
[Include a computation of all categories of damages sought and the basis and theory for calculating damages. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(C). This should include the claims of all parties. It should also include a description of the economic damages, noneconomic damages, and physical impairment claimed, if any.]5. REPORT OF PRECONFERENCE DISCOVERY AND MEETING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f)
a. Date of rule 26(f) meeting.b. Names of each participant and party he/she represented.
c. Proposed changes, if any, in timing or requirement of disclosures under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1).
d. Statement as to when rule 26(a)(1) disclosures were made or will be made.
[If a party's disclosures were not made within the time provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1), the party must provide here an explanation showing good cause for the omission.]
e. Statement concerning any agreements to conduct informal discovery, including joint interviews with potential witnesses, exchanges of documents, and joint meetings with clients to discuss settlement. If there is agreement to conduct joint interviews with potential witnesses, list the names of such witnesses and a date and time for the interview which has been agreed to by the witness, all counsel, and all pro se parties.
6. CONSENT
[Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, all full-time magistrate judges in the District of Colorado are specially designated under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) to conduct any or all proceedings in any jury or nonjury civil matter and to order the entry of judgment. Upon consent of the parties and an order of reference from the district judge, the magistrate judge assigned the case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(a) and (b) will hold the scheduling conference and retain settlement jurisdiction, whereas pretrial case management, jurisdiction of dispositive motions, and trial will be assigned to the magistrate judge drawn at random under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2.] [Indicate below the parties' consent choice.]
All parties [have or have not] consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.
7. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE
a. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings:
[Set time period within which to join other parties and to amend all pleadings. This portion of the scheduling order relates to timing only. It does not eliminate the necessity to file an appropriate motion and to otherwise comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. Unless otherwise ordered in a particular case, for good cause, these dates should be no later than 45 days after the date of the scheduling conference, so as to minimize the possibility that late amendments and joinder of parties will precipitate requests for extensions of discovery cutoff, final pretrial conference, and dispositive motion dates. Counsel and pro se parties should plan discovery so that discovery designed to identify additional parties or claims is completed before these deadlines.]
b. Discovery Cut-off:
c. Dispositive Motion Deadline:
[Set time periods in which discovery is to be completed and dispositive motions are to be filed.]
d. Expert Witness Disclosure
[(1) State anticipated fields of expert testimony, if any. (2) State any limitations proposed on the use or number of expert witnesses. (3) The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel and any pro se party with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before __________________, 200_. (4) The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel and any pro se party with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before _______________, 200_. (5) Notwithstanding the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B), no exception to the requirements of the rule will be allowed by stipulation of the parties unless the stipulation is approved by the court.]
e. Deposition Schedule:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Name of Deponent | Date of Deposition | Time of | Expected Length of | | | | Deposition | Deposition | |------------------|---------------------|------------|--------------------| |------------------|---------------------|------------|--------------------| |------------------|---------------------|------------|--------------------| |------------------|---------------------|------------|--------------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------[List the names of persons to be deposed and a schedule of any depositions to be taken, including (i) a good faith estimate of the time needed for the deposition and (ii) time(s) and date(s)for the deposition which have been agreed to by the deponent and persons signing the scheduling order.]
f. Interrogatory Schedule
[Set a schedule for the submission of and response to written interrogatories, if any are desired.]
g. Schedule for Request for Production of Documents
[Set a schedule for the submission of and response to requests for documents, if any are desired.]
h. Discovery Limitations:
(1) Any limits which any party wishes to propose on the number of depositions.
(2) Any limits which any party wishes to propose on the length of depositions.
(3) Modifications which any party proposes on the presumptive numbers of depositions or interrogatories contained in the federal rules.
(4) Limitations which any party proposes on number of requests for production of documents and/or requests for admissions.
[At the rule 26(f) meeting, the parties should make a good-faith attempt to agree to limit the number of depositions, interrogatories, requests for admissions, and requests for production. In the majority of cases, the parties should anticipate that discovery, will be limited as specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A), 33.]
(5) Other Planning or Discovery Orders
[Set forth any other proposed orders concerning scheduling or discovery.]
8. SETTLEMENT
[The parties must certify here that, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), they have discussed the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case by alternate dispute resolution. They must also report the result of any such meeting, and any similar future meeting, to the magistrate judge within ten days of the meeting.]9. OTHER SCHEDULING ISSUES
a. A statement of those discovery or scheduling issues, if any, on which counsel, after a good-faith effort, were unable to reach an agreement.b. Anticipated length of trial and whether trial is to the court or jury.
10. DATES FOR FURTHER CONFERENCES
[The magistrate judge will complete this section at the scheduling conference if he or she has not already set deadlines by an order filed before the conference.]
a. A settlement conference will be held on________________________ at ______ o'clock __.m.
It is hereby ordered that all settlement conferences that take place before the magistrate judge shall be confidential.
() Pro se parties and attorneys only need be present.
() Pro se parties, attorneys, and client representatives with authority to settle must be present. (NOTE: This requirement is not fulfilled by the presence of counsel. If an insurance company is involved, an adjustor authorized to enter into settlement must also be present.)
() Each party shall submit a Confidential Settlement Statement to the magistrate judge on or before _______________ outlining the facts and issues in the case and the party's settlement position.
b. Status conferences will be held in this case at the following dates and times: _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
c. A final pretrial conference will be held in this case on __________________at _____ o'clock __.m. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than five days before the final pretrial conference.
11. OTHER MATTERS
[The following paragraph shall be included in the scheduling order:]In addition to filing an appropriate notice with the clerk's office, counsel must file a copy of any notice of withdrawal, notice of substitution of counsel, or notice of change of counsel's address or telephone number with the clerk of the magistrate judge assigned to this case.
In addition to filing an appropriate notice with the clerk's office, a pro se party must file a copy of a notice of change of his or her address or telephone number with the clerk of the magistrate judge assigned to this case.
With respect to discovery disputes, parties must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A.
The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1D. by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.
12. AMENDMENTS TO SCHEDULING ORDER
[Include a statement that the scheduling order may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.]
DATED this ______ day of _____________ 200_.
BY THE COURT:
________________________________ MICHAEL J. WATANABE United States Magistrate JudgePro Pro Se Se APPROVED: _________________________________________ ________________________________________ (Name) (Name) (Address) (Address) (Address) (Address) (Telephone Number) (Telephone Number) Attorney for Plaintiff (or Plaintiff, Attorney for Defendant (or Defendant, ) ) [Please affix counsels' and any pro se party's signatures before submission of the scheduling order to the court.]