From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV140-LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV140-LG-JMR.

November 20, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation [24] entered by Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on October 7, 2008. Judge Roper recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Administrative Remedy Program, Carolyn Banyard, Viscia Pointer, Michael Weeks, and Harry Peace, should be granted. The plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

There is no indication that the defendant, Gala Matthews, has been served with process in this case. On March 8, 2007, the plaintiff filed a proof of service as to the defendant, Drug and Alcohol Program at Parchman. However, there is no indication that the Drug and Alcohol Program at Parchman has ever made an appearance in this lawsuit.

Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). In such cases, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996).

Having conducted the required review, the Court finds that the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Therefore, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation entered by Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper should be adopted as the opinion of this Court and thus, that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [24] entered by Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on October 7, 2008, is ADOPTED as the as the finding of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Administrative Remedy Program, Carolyn Banyard, Viscia Pointer, Michael Weeks, and Harry Peace, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants, Gala Matthews and the Drug and Alcohol Program at Parchman, are still pending before the Court.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV140-LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN BROWN PLAINTIFF v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV140-LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Shaffer v. Miss. Highway Safety Patrol

Such immunity, however, does not apply to plaintiff's claims for monetary damages against Moore in his…