From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2016
No. 2:15-CV-1687-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-CV-1687-GEB-CMK-P

07-06-2016

DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. MONICA MILLER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. 13) to file objections to the court's February 24, 2016, findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing therefor, the request is granted. Plaintiff's objections are due within 30 days of the date of this order.

Plaintiff also seeks the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). A finding of "exceptional circumstances" requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims on his own in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017. Neither factor is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision. See id.

In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances. First, plaintiff has demonstrated an ability to articulate his claims on his own. Second, for the reasons outlined in the February 24, 2016, findings and recommendations, there appears little likelihood of success on the merits.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. 13) is granted;

2. Plaintiff may file objections to the court's February 24, 2016, findings and recommendations within 30 days of the date of this order; and

3. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 13) is denied. DATED: July 6, 2016

/s/_________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2016
No. 2:15-CV-1687-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Brown v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. MONICA MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-CV-1687-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)