From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 26, 2019
169 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8518 Index 303309/14

02-26-2019

Tonjalaya BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Derrick MCKENZIE, Defendant–Respondent, Value Store It, LLC, Defendant–Appellant.

Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson (Glenn A. Kaminska of counsel), for appellant. Cerussi & Spring, P.C., White Plains (Christopher B. Roberta of counsel), for respondent.


Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson (Glenn A. Kaminska of counsel), for appellant.

Cerussi & Spring, P.C., White Plains (Christopher B. Roberta of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kahn, Moulton, JJ.

Value failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law under the Graves Amendment ( 49 USC § 30106 [a][1]; Cassidy v. DCFS Trust, 89 A.D.3d 591, 933 N.Y.S.2d 31 [1st Dept. 2011] ). The evidence submitted by Value was insufficient to show that it was engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles. Rather, the evidence showed that Value was in the business of renting storage space and that the certificate of title for the subject vehicle designates its use as "private."

We have considered Value's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Brown v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 26, 2019
169 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. McKenzie

Case Details

Full title:Tonjalaya Brown, Plaintiff, v. Derrick McKenzie, Defendant-Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
92 N.Y.S.3d 873
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1364

Citing Cases

Steigelman v. Transervice Lease Corp.

Wakefern's submissions did not establish as a matter of law that it was engaged in the trade or business of…