From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. McCullough

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0093 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0093 JFM (PC).

April 22, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 4, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: April 21, 2011.


Summaries of

Brown v. McCullough

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0093 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. McCullough

Case Details

Full title:RICKY L. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. J. McCULLOUGH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0093 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)