From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BROWN v. MAE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 28, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-0920-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-0920-RLH-PAL.

September 28, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff Kirsha Brown is proceeding in this action pro se. She filed a Complaint on June 15, 2010, which was screened and found insufficient to state a claim. The Complaint was dismissed, but she was allowed, by Order (#5) dated July 7, 2010, thirty days to file an amended complaint. The Order provided that failure to file an Amended Complaint within the time allowed would result in the case being dismissed. On August 19, 2010, she filed a Motion to Extend time to Amend Complaint (#8), which was granted by Order (#10) on August 23, 2010, in which she was given until September 23, 2010, to file the Amended Complaint. She has failed to comply with an order of this Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint and this case is hereby dismissed.

Dated: September 28, 2010.


Summaries of

BROWN v. MAE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 28, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-0920-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2010)
Case details for

BROWN v. MAE

Case Details

Full title:KIRSHA BROWN, Plaintiff(s), v. SALLIE MAE, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 28, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-0920-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2010)