From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Kyle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06539-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06539-AWI-SKO PC

02-28-2012

ALFRED BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID KYLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD

NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST THEM FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER


(Doc. 96)


TEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Alfred Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on November 15, 2004. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on October 23, 2006, against Defendants Kyle and Ruff for acting with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Jury trial is scheduled for October 2, 2012.

On December 23, 2011, the Court issued an order requiring (1) the parties to meet and confer regarding the possibility of settlement and (2) Defendants to file a status report within sixty days. Defendants failed to comply with the filing deadline of February 24, 2012. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.

Accordingly, Defendants SHALL show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, why sanctions should not be imposed against them for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Kyle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06539-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Kyle

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID KYLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06539-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)