From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Kim Do

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:22-CV-1781-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1781-DMC-P

11-09-2022

TSHAWNA BROWN, also known as LACRISHA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. KIM DO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted.

The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Kim Do

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:22-CV-1781-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. Kim Do

Case Details

Full title:TSHAWNA BROWN, also known as LACRISHA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. KIM DO, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-1781-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)