Brown v. Keystone Human Servs.

Full title: LARITA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 25, 2022

CIVIL 1:21-cv-0249 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 25, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:21-cv-0249

07-25-2022

LARITA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the court is Magistrate Judge Arbuckle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) which recommends, upon a second careful screening of the complaint after Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint despite receiving generous extensions of time to do so, that the court dismiss the complaint and close this case. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 19) to the report and recommendation; however, those objections simply restate allegations and arguments previously asserted in her complaint and thus are not entitled to de novo review. Magistrate Judge Arbuckle's report and recommendation is thorough and well-reasoned, and the court is satisfied that it contains no error. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED;

2) The complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case; and

4) Any appeal taken from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.