From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Kaplan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jul 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447(MTT)

07-06-2012

ANTHONY BERNARD BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN E. KAPLAN, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 19). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). (Doc. 13). The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed.

________________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Brown v. Kaplan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jul 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BERNARD BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN E. KAPLAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 6, 2012)