From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2014
CASE NO. CV 14-0116-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-0116-DDP (PJW)

07-16-2014

KENNETH BROWN, Petitioner, v. RICHARD IVES, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING

PETITION WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

__________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2014
CASE NO. CV 14-0116-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Brown v. Ives

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BROWN, Petitioner, v. RICHARD IVES, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-0116-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Picart v. Pollard

First, the lack of video surveillance evidence does not implicate a due process violation under Wolff. See…

Oliver v. Tingley

; see Brown v. Ives, No. 14-cv-0116-DDP PJW, 2014 WL 3534055, at *2 (C.D. Cal. July 16, 2014)…