From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Hurley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 2, 2015
No. 4:13-cv-01515-JAR (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:13-cv-01515-JAR

10-02-2015

DERAUGHN BROWN, Petitioner, v. JAMES HURLEY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Deraughn Brown's Motion Requesting Permission to Submit Supplement Reply Brief (Doc. 17). Petitioner seeks leave to file a supplemental reply brief to clarify/correct deficiencies in arguments already presented in his reply brief. For good cause shown, the Court will grant Petitioner's Motion.

Petitioner also filed a motion entitled "Consideration of Evidentiary Hearing" in which he requests an evidentiary hearing (Doc. 18). Petitioner asserts that this is not a matter that could be resolved based on the state court record because his claims were not presented in state court due to post conviction relief counsel's ineffectiveness. Petitioner also argues that the Court should consider a hearing because there are relevant facts in dispute on this "insufficient record". Specifically, Petitioner notes that he and Respondent are in dispute about counsel's testimony at the post-conviction hearing regarding whether counsel discussed the potential of a lesser-included offense. This is Petitioner's second such motion. Again, at this stage of the litigation, it appears that the state court record contains sufficient facts to make an informed decision on the merits of Petitioner's claims. Petitioner is further advised that the "state court record" contains portions of his post-conviction file including a transcript of the evidentiary hearing. If the Court later determines that this record is insufficient to resolve the issues, the Court will schedule an evidentiary hearing. Therefore, the Court will deny Petitioner's motion at this time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Brown's Motion Requesting Permission to Submit Supplement Reply Brief (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion entitled "Consideration of Evidentiary Hearing" (Doc. 18) is DENIED, without prejudice. Dated this 2nd day of October, 2015.

/s/ _________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Hurley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 2, 2015
No. 4:13-cv-01515-JAR (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Brown v. Hurley

Case Details

Full title:DERAUGHN BROWN, Petitioner, v. JAMES HURLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 2, 2015

Citations

No. 4:13-cv-01515-JAR (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2015)