Opinion
Case No. 3:13-cv-1550-JCS
05-02-2013
RICHARD BROWN and RHONDA BROWN, Plaintiff(s), v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, Defendant(s).
SEDGWICK LLP RALPH A. CAMPILLO (State Bar No. 70376) ARAMEH ZARGHAM O'BOYLE (State Bar No. 239495) SEDGWICK LLP WAYNE A. WOLFF (State Bar No. 161351) Attorneys for Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics) Arameh Zargham O'Boyle Ralph A. Campillo Wayne A. Wolff Attorneys for Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics) Rachel Abrams William A. Levin Lauren L. Simes Attorneys for Plaintiffs Richard Brown and Rhonda Brown
SEDGWICK LLP
RALPH A. CAMPILLO (State Bar No. 70376)
ARAMEH ZARGHAM O'BOYLE (State Bar No. 239495)
SEDGWICK LLP
WAYNE A. WOLFF (State Bar No. 161351)
Attorneys for Defendant
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
(sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics)
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Richard Brown and Rhonda Brown ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to a thirty (30) day extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant shall have until, and including, June 5, 2013, to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.
So Stipulated.
SEDGWICK LLP
By: __________________________
Arameh Zargham O'Boyle
Ralph A. Campillo
Wayne A. Wolff
Attorneys for Defendant
Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica
Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics)
LEVIN SIMES LLP
By: __________________________
Rachel Abrams
William A. Levin
Lauren L. Simes
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Richard Brown and
Rhonda Brown
PROOF OF SERVICE
Richard Brown, et al. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al.
USDC-NDCA; Case No. 3:13-cv-1550-JCS
I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is Sedgwick LLP, 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556. On April 30, 2013, I served the within document(s):
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
[ ] FACSIMILE - by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth on the attached Telecommunications Cover Page(s) on this date before 5:00 p.m.William A. Levin, Esq.
[ ] MAIL - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California addressed as set forth below.
[X] ELECTRONIC - by electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to the electronic notification address(es) of the addressee(s) listed below.
[ ] OVERNIGHT COURIER - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with shipping prepaid, and depositing in a collection box for next day delivery to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below via [delivery method] .
Laurel L. Simes, Esq.
Rachel Abrams, Esq.
LEVINE SIMES LLP
353 Sacramento Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 426-3000
Fascimile: (415) 426-3001
Attorneys For Plaintiffs
RICHARD BROWN and RHONDA BROWN
I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on April 30, 2013, at Los Angeles, California.
________________________
Barbara Fergerson