From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Heintz

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
May 1, 2018
NO. 2017-C-0759 (La. Ct. App. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2017-C-0759

05-01-2018

DALE BROWN v. DAVID HEINTZ, STEVEN VERRETT, AND ARTHUR LAWSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITYAS THE CHIEF FOR POLICE FOR THE CITY OF GRETNA


BROWN, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT WITH REASONS.

I concur with the majority and find the district court erred in denying Relator's peremptory exception of prescription. I write separately to express that while I am constrained to rule in accordance with current jurisprudence, I do find, however, the outcome in this case troubling as it deprives Plaintiff of his day in court. I am in agreement with current Chief Justice Johnson's and former Chief Justice Calogero's dissents in Skipper v. Boothe, 08-1292, pp. 1-2 (La. 10/3/08), 991 So.2d 462, 463-64 (dissenting Calogero, C.J., and Johnson, J.), that Louisiana should adopt the "mailbox rule" for all pro se inmate filings.


Summaries of

Brown v. Heintz

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
May 1, 2018
NO. 2017-C-0759 (La. Ct. App. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. Heintz

Case Details

Full title:DALE BROWN v. DAVID HEINTZ, STEVEN VERRETT, AND ARTHUR LAWSON, IN HIS…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

NO. 2017-C-0759 (La. Ct. App. May. 1, 2018)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Heintz

As noted at the outset of this opinion, this matter is now before us on remand from the Louisiana Supreme…