From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01413 (D.D.C. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01413

08-04-2011

SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT GRAY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the Court consolidates six complaints and applications to proceed in forma pauperis. Each complaint names a single defendant for whom plaintiff supplies a District of Columbia address, and the maximum amount plaintiff demands in damages is $40,000. In no case does plaintiff establish federal question jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or diversity jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss these complaints for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

____________________

United States District Judge
Attachment A


Summaries of

Brown v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01413 (D.D.C. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT GRAY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01413 (D.D.C. Aug. 4, 2011)