From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

February, 1936.

Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.


The complaint states a cause of action in negligence for personal injuries. It is alleged that on July 22, 1933, the parties were both in the employ of Randforce Amusement Corporation; that respondent was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by appellant, and that at the time of the accident they were both acting within the scope of their common employment. Order denying defendant's motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Brown v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Brown v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BROWN, Respondent, v. ERWIN GOLD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)