From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 23, 2023
3:22-cv-00130-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 23, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00130-RCJ-CSD

10-23-2023

SHAWN K. BROWN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 counseled habeas corpus petition. Despite being represented by counsel, Petitioner Shawn K. Brown has filed a “motion for withdrawal of attorney of record and request for records/court case documents.” (ECF Nos. 25, 26.) Once an attorney has made an appearance on behalf of a party, the party may not personally file any document with the court. LR IA 11-6. Brown's filings are fugitive documents not properly before the court. Accordingly, they shall be stricken. However, because Brown appears to want to terminate his counsel of record and represent himself, the court instructs Rick Mula, Esq. to inform the court about any issues with his ongoing representation of Brown before December 5, 2023.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's pro se motions (ECF Nos. 25, 26) shall be stricken as fugitive documents.

It is further ordered that Rick Mula, Esq. inform the court about any issues with his ongoing representation of Brown on or before December 5, 2023.


Summaries of

Brown v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 23, 2023
3:22-cv-00130-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Brown v. Gittere

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN K. BROWN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 23, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00130-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 23, 2023)