From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Gary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Oct 4, 2017
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-714-RV-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-714-RV-GRJ

10-04-2017

ANTHONY DARNELL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ADAM CHASE GARY and ZACHARY L STACY, Defendants.


ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, a detainee at the Escambia County Jail, initiated this prisoner civil rights case by filing a complaint on September 12, 2017, in Escambia County Circuit Court. Defendants removed the case to this Court on September 28, 2017. ECF No. 1. Defendants then filed a motion for more definite statement, which has been referred to the undersigned. ECF No. 3.

On September 13, 2017, prior to removal of this case, Plaintiff filed an identical complaint in this Court. That case has been assigned Case Number 3:17-cv-678-LC-CJK (N.D. Fla.). Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed as a pauper in that case, with assessment of an initial partial filing fee that is due to be paid by October 18, 2017. See Brown v. Gary, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-678-LC-CJK, ECF No. 7. It must be noted that although the Court's complaint form requires prisoners to disclose whether they have "initiated other actions in state court dealing with the same or similar facts/issues involved in this action," Plaintiff represented that he had filed no such cases. Id., ECF No. 1.

Because Plaintiff elected to file the identical complaint in this Court prior to removal of this case from state court, this case should be dismissed as duplicative.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's motion for more definite statement, ECF No. 3, is MOOT. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case should be DISMISSED as duplicative.

IN CHAMBERS this 4th day of October 2017.

/s/_________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only , and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. If a party fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim or issue contained in a report and recommendation, that party waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Summaries of

Brown v. Gary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Oct 4, 2017
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-714-RV-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Brown v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DARNELL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ADAM CHASE GARY and ZACHARY L STACY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-714-RV-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2017)