From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Aug 27, 2018
4:18CV3115 (D. Neb. Aug. 27, 2018)

Opinion

4:18CV3115

08-27-2018

JESUS BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT FRAKES, Director Department of Corrections, individually and in their official capacities; OFFICER CHAN, individually and in their official capacities; CORPORAL THOMAS SORENSEN, individually and in their official capacities; LT. KENNEY, individually and in their official capacities; SGT. MILLIKAN, individually and in their official capacities; DEPUTY DIRECTOR HARBANS DEOL DO, PHD, individually and in their official capacities; DOCTOR GARY HUSTAD, individually and in their official capacities; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT VAUGHAN WENZEL, individually and in their official capacities; and PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT DAN DANAHER, individually and in their official capacities; Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") (filing no. 2) and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 4).

I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IFP

Plaintiff requests leave to proceed IFP. The court has received a copy of Plaintiff's trust account information. (Filing No. 5.) Plaintiff is permitted to proceed IFP.

Prisoner plaintiffs are required to pay the full amount of the court's $350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the court, even if the prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Prison Litigation Reform Act "makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal." In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529-30 (8th Cir. 1997); Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Neb. 2001).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of Plaintiff's average monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. Here, the court finds the initial partial filing fee is $5.95, based on an average monthly account balance of $29.76. Plaintiff must pay this initial partial filing fee within 30 days or his case will be subject to dismissal. Plaintiff may request an extension of time if one is needed.

In addition to the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff must "make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The statute places the burden on the prisoner's institution to collect the additional monthly payments and forward them to the court as follows:

After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Therefore, after payment in full of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the remaining installments of the filing fee and forward the payments to the court.

Plaintiff is advised he will remain responsible for the entire filing fee, as long as he is a prisoner, even if the case is dismissed at some later time. See In re Tyler, 110 F.3d at 529-30; Jackson, 173 F. Supp. 2d at 951.

II. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking the court to appoint him counsel. (Filing No. 4.) The court cannot routinely appoint counsel in civil cases. In Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals explained that "[i]ndigent civil litigants do not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel." Trial courts have "broad discretion to decide whether both the plaintiff and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel, taking into account the factual and legal complexity of the case, the presence or absence of conflicting testimony, and the plaintiff's ability to investigate the facts and present his claim." Id. Having considered these factors, the request for the appointment of counsel will be denied without prejudice to reassertion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 4) is denied without prejudice to reassertion.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. 2) is granted.

3. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $5.95 within 30 days, unless the court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a written motion.

4. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the court.

5. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution.

6. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 26, 2018: initial partial filing fee payment due.

7. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 27th day of August, 2018.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Aug 27, 2018
4:18CV3115 (D. Neb. Aug. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. Frakes

Case Details

Full title:JESUS BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT FRAKES, Director Department of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Aug 27, 2018

Citations

4:18CV3115 (D. Neb. Aug. 27, 2018)

Citing Cases

Beckwith v. Burrough

There are cases which hold that the purchaser is as much entitled after sale, as the creditor before sale, to…