From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1943
31 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1943)

Opinion

Argued February term 1943.

Decided April 30th, 1943.

A trustee may on its own account, in the course of litigation seeking discovery and an accounting, purchase with the leave of the court, securities, the legality of which has been questioned.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Aquila N. Venino, for the complainant-appellant.

Messrs. Hood, Lafferty Emerson ( Mr. Charles Danzig), for Fidelity Union Trust Co.


The complainant charges mismanagement of a trust estate of which she is beneficiary. She seeks discovery and an accounting. The trustee, in the meantime, secured an order from the Court of Chancery permitting it to purchase for cash for full value certain questioned securities.

It is clear from the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor that all questions to be settled in the litigation remain open, even the question of interest and the rate thereof. The only thing accomplished by the order was to improve the trust estate by substituting legals for securities in doubt, and in no way does it end the litigation.

The order appealed from so modified is affirmed. For modification — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.


Summaries of

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1943
31 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1943)
Case details for

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:STELLA D. BROWN, formerly STELLA D. GUTER, complainant-appellant, v…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 1943

Citations

31 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1943)
31 A.2d 811

Citing Cases

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

By a second supplement, the account has been brought up to January 1st, 1944. Exceptions have been filed by…

Brown v. Fid. Union Trust Co.

Decree in accordance with opinion. See, also, 133 N.J.Eq. 278, 31 A.2d 811. Testator gave his residuary…