From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Equifax

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 26, 2009
Case No. 3:08-CV-04246-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-CV-04246-MMC.

February 26, 2009


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE


Cara Hergenroether, an active member in good standing of the bar of Georgia whose business address and telephone number isKing Spalding, LLP, 1180 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, (404) 215-5796, having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.


Summaries of

Brown v. Equifax

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 26, 2009
Case No. 3:08-CV-04246-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Equifax

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTUS M. BROWN, II, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX, EXPERIAN TRANSUNION…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-CV-04246-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)