"When the only question for determination requires a consideration of the evidence and where no transcript of the evidence is contained in the record, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. [Cit.]" Brown v. Donahoo, 141 Ga. App. 309, 310 ( 233 S.E.2d 269) (1977). Lawson's appeal from the denial of his motion for directed verdict requires consideration of all the evidence, and his submission of the transcript of the testimony of one witness presents an insufficient record for that purpose.

The deposition was then admitted in evidence and forms part of the record on appeal, although a transcript of the trial was deliberately omitted by appellant. Appellee argues that we therefore cannot reach the merits of the issue on appeal because the transcript is necessary for a consideration of it. While that is generally true, Tempo Carpet Co. v. Collectible Classic Cars, 166 Ga. App. 564 ( 305 S.E.2d 26) (1983), Brown v. Donahoo, 141 Ga. App. 309, 310 (1) ( 233 S.E.2d 269) (1977), the reason is that we would need to examine the evidence produced at trial to ascertain whether it together with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demand a particular verdict, a verdict against the non-moving party. Carver v. Jones, 166 Ga. App. 197, 199 (3) ( 303 S.E.2d 529) (1983).

Cason v. Upson County Bd. of Health, 227 Ga. 451, 453 (2) ( 181 S.E.2d 487). See Brown v. Donahoo, 141 Ga. App. 309 ( 233 S.E.2d 269); Chapman v. Conner, 138 Ga. App. 518 ( 226 S.E.2d 625). In his brief, counsel argues that the trial court was not authorized by Code Ann. § 81A-160 (g) to amend, nunc pro tunc, its order of March 20, 1978, on the basis of clerical mistake.

]" Chapman v. Conner, 138 Ga. App. 518 ( 226 S.E.2d 625). See Brown v. Donahoo, 141 Ga. App. 309 (1) ( 233 S.E.2d 269). 2.