From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Delek U.S. Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 10, 2009
NO. 3:09-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 3:09-0179.

December 10, 2009


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 40), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 24) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In addition, Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Docket No. 29) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Plaintiff's Section 1981 claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Tennessee Human Rights Act retaliation claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED. All claims against Defendants Yemin, Ploehn and Berry are DISMISSED with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (Docket No. 38) is moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Delek U.S. Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 10, 2009
NO. 3:09-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Delek U.S. Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERALD J. BROWN, SR. v. DELEK U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

NO. 3:09-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Fluid Routing Solutions, Inc.

Likewise, there is no indication that Ross's refusal to honor Phillips's request to not post the…

Hargis v. Vulcan Constr. Materials

The situation regarding Plaintiff's ostensible TDA retaliation claim is reminiscent of Brown v. Delek U.S. …