From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Dantzler

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 1, 2009
09-CV-0921 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2009)

Opinion

09-CV-0921 (ARR) (JO).

September 1, 2009


ORDER


The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated August 11, 2009 from the Honorable James Orenstein, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); accord Edwards v. Town of Huntineton, No. 05 Civ. 339 (NGG) (AKT), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50074, at *6 (E.D.N.Y. July 11, 2007);McKoy v. Henderson, No. 05 Civ. 1535 (DAB), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15673, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. March 5, 2007). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Dantzler

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 1, 2009
09-CV-0921 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Dantzler

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY DANTZLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 1, 2009

Citations

09-CV-0921 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2009)

Citing Cases

Grice v. Sperling

It is within the Court's inherent power "to manage its own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and…