From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Daikin Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2021
18 CIVIL 11091 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2021)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11091 (PAC)

05-04-2021

JUSTIN BROWN and TELISA LIPSCOMB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.; BETH DONALDS; PAUL GREER; DONNA JOHNSTON; KASUHITO KITSUHIKO; MIKE LADD and LISA WILL, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 4, 2021, Daikin's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

May 4, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Brown v. Daikin Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2021
18 CIVIL 11091 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Brown v. Daikin Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN BROWN and TELISA LIPSCOMB, individually and on behalf of all others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 4, 2021

Citations

18 CIVIL 11091 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2021)