Summary
affirming district court's order that seized property be used to pay off monetary penalties imposed as part of defendant's sentence and concluding that such allocation was for defendant's benefit, rather than depriving him of his property altogether
Summary of this case from U.S. v. TAYO FUNSHO OMOWUNMIOpinion
No. 90-7069.
May 20, 1991.
ORDERS
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 906 F. 2d 667.