From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2009
CASE NUMBER: 07-15418 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 07-15418.

March 9, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On February 13, 2009, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #14) recommending that the Court: (1) DENY Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #10); (2) DENY Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #12); and (3) GRANT Plaintiff's motion to, in the alternative, remand the matter to the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ").

Because the Court has not received objections from either party within the time frame provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. R. 72.1(d)(2), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court, therefore, DENIES both parties' Motions for Summary Judgment and REMANDS this matter to the ALJ for further consideration. On remand, the ALJ must incorporate all of Plaintiff's limitations, including his "moderate" limitations in concentration, persistence and pace, into any hypothetical to the vocational expert.

IT IS ORDERED.

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on March 9, 2009.


Summaries of

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2009
CASE NUMBER: 07-15418 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BROWN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2009

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 07-15418 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2009)

Citing Cases

Fournier v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Here, the ALJ determined that plaintiff had moderate limitations in concentration, persistence, or pace, yet…

Cummings v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Plaintiff is correct that a number of decisions out of this district have concluded that hypothetical…