From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Commissioner Jeffrey Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-826 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-826.

July 26, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2006, after the plaintiff, Keith Brown, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after motions to dismiss were submitted by defendants Dr. Ravindranath Kolli and Adam Edelman, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 110), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the amended complaint (Docket No. 52) is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Dr. Ravindranath Kolli (Docket No. 106) is dismissed as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Adam Edelman (Docket No. 108) is dismissed as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Brown v. Commissioner Jeffrey Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-826 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. Commissioner Jeffrey Beard

Case Details

Full title:KEITH BROWN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 26, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-826 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 26, 2006)