From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Co. Harrington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 5, 2010
Civil No. 09-14211 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-14211.

August 5, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil-rights complaint [dkt 1] under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants have violated certain of his constitutional rights, including allegations that he was denied access to the law library and was physically assaulted by prison staff. The matter is currently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation [dkt 20], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment in part and deny the motion in part. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within the appropriate time period.

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt 20] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Co. Harrington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 5, 2010
Civil No. 09-14211 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. Co. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:RONALD KIRK BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CO. HARRINGTON et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 5, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-14211 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 5, 2010)