From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0538 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0538 DFL JFM P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 13, 2006 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Brown v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0538 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. R.L. CLARK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0538 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)