From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2011
No. 07 CV 0429 JCW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. 07 CV 0429 JCW.

February 4, 2011


ORDER


An appeal "from a district court to a court of appeals may be taken only by filing a notice of appeal with the district clerk." Fed.R.App.P. 3(a)(1). The notice of appeal "must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after the judgment or order appealed from is entered." Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1)(A). "District courts may not construe an untimely notice of appeal as a motion for extension of time. Pettibone v. Cupp, 666 F.2d 333, 335 (9th Cir. 1981). "The procedures set forth in rule 4 are strictly construed; there is no exception for prisoners proceeding pro se or for habeas corpus actions." Malone v. Avenenti, 850 F.2d 569, 572 (9th Cir. 1988). Because Brown has not filed his notice of appeal within 30 days of the August 11, 2010 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that Brown's motion for a certificate of appealability is denied.

DATED: February 3, 2011


Summaries of

Brown v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2011
No. 07 CV 0429 JCW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:TYRELL TRAVIS BROWN, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 4, 2011

Citations

No. 07 CV 0429 JCW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2011)