From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. City of Sault Ste. Marie

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 21, 2017
896 N.W.2d 427 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154851 COA: 330508

06-21-2017

Alice M. BROWN, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE, Eric Fountain, Greg Schmitigal, Mike Breakie, Jeff Killips, and Bruce Lipponen, Defendants–Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals properly applied MCL 691.1404(1) ("[t]he notice shall specify ... the injury sustained ...") when it concluded that the plaintiff's notice, "when read as a whole," was adequate because the notice "referenced documents" that more fully described the plaintiff's injuries. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

Brown v. City of Sault Ste. Marie

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 21, 2017
896 N.W.2d 427 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

Brown v. City of Sault Ste. Marie

Case Details

Full title:Alice M. BROWN, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE, Eric…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jun 21, 2017

Citations

896 N.W.2d 427 (Mich. 2017)