From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. CDC Director

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
No. CIV S-08-1880 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1880 EFB P.

February 8, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On August 21, 2009, the court dismissed plaintiff's amended complaint with leave to amend. The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint may result in this action being dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Brown v. CDC Director

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
No. CIV S-08-1880 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. CDC Director

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE O'NEAL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CDC DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1880 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)