From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. CareMark Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jan 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 11-1733 (W.D. La. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 11-1733

01-12-2012

TAMMY E. BROWN v. CAREMARK LOUISIANA


U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DEE DRELL

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to remand, doc. #13, be DENIED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 12 day January, 2012.

_______________

DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. CareMark Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jan 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 11-1733 (W.D. La. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. CareMark Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY E. BROWN v. CAREMARK LOUISIANA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 11-1733 (W.D. La. Jan. 12, 2012)