From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Brownlee

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
May 17, 2010
4:10CV00253JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. May. 17, 2010)

Opinion

4:10CV00253JMM/JTK.

May 17, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and plaintiff's complaint against defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice to re-file after exhaustion of his available remedies. This dismissal shall be considered a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA.

An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Brownlee

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
May 17, 2010
4:10CV00253JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. May. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. Brownlee

Case Details

Full title:KEITH BROWN, ADC #138611 PLAINTIFF v. LEROY BROWNLEE, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: May 17, 2010

Citations

4:10CV00253JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. May. 17, 2010)