From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-3053 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-3053 KJM KJN P

07-19-2012

DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

On June 6, 2012, the court granted plaintiff a thirty day extension of time to file a second amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
br3053.fta(2)


Summaries of

Brown v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-3053 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-3053 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)