Id. In making that determination, the plain meaning of the language in the trust instrument controls, and we do not look beyond the four corners of the instrument unless we determine that the language is ambiguous. Brown v. Brown, No. W2009-02264-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 441266, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2011). The provision at issue here states:
Some additional defendants were dismissed but are not at issue on appeal. On appeal to this Court, in Ryne W. Brown v. Catherine L. Brown, Trustee, et al.,No. W2009-02264-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 441266 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2011), we first addressed Ryne's contention that he was a beneficiary presently entitled to distributions from the trust. After quoting several relevant provisions of the trust agreement, we summarized their effect as follows: