From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

March, 1920.


Defendant's [plaintiff's] former medical practice has been interrupted by military service. In the period since his discharge from the army he has not regained his former income. Hence we do not now disturb the weekly alimony as decreed. We, however, vary the judgment by adding a clause at the foot thereof that in case the circumstances of either party change, an application may then be made to the court to modify the provision for alimony. As thus varied the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Brown v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BROWN, Respondent, v. ETHEL BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1920

Citations

191 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)