Opinion
Ex. No. 10221.
February 14, 1992, Decided
Edwards & Angell, Gerald W. Harrington, Providence, for petitioner.
Matthew E. Ward, Aram A. Arabian, Providence, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
After our opinion in the above cause was filed the petitioner asked and received permission to present a motion for leave to reargue. Pursuant thereto she has filed such a motion, setting out therein certain reasons on which she bases her contention that justice requires a reargument of the case.
We have carefully considered those reasons and we are of the opinion that they suggest nothing which in the circumstances warrants a reargument.
The motion is denied, and the cause is remanded to the family court with direction to dismiss the petition for divorce for lack of jurisdiction in accordance with our original opinion.