From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
1:19-cv-01796-ADA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01796-ADA

10-13-2022

STEVEN ALLEN BROWN, Petitioner, v. RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent.[1]


DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER REGARDING POST-PETITION SCHEDULING

The record reflects that on September 30, 2022, Petitioner filed in this proceeding his initial federal habeas corpus petition. The Court previously ordered that it would provide further scheduling and set any necessary case management conference after filing of the petition.

Accordingly, counsel for the parties, by not later than thirty (30) days following the service date of this order, are directed to meet and confer and then file a joint (preferred) or separate statement addressing their respective positions as to:

1. Which claims and subclaims asserted in the federal petition are exhausted, partially exhausted, or unexhausted.

2. A schedule upon which Petitioner shall file any motion for exhaustion stay; Respondent shall file his answer or any other responsive pleading; and Petitioner shall file his reply or other response thereto.

3. Whether a case management conference is requested as to the foregoing.

The Court will review the statement(s) and provide further case scheduling and/or set any necessary case management conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
1:19-cv-01796-ADA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. Broomfield

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ALLEN BROWN, Petitioner, v. RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

1:19-cv-01796-ADA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)