From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Boyd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
517 F. App'x 138 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-8075

04-02-2013

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. BOYD, Officer, Defendant - Appellee.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:11-cr-00330-RBS-LRL) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Boyd, No. 2:11-cv-00330-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Brown v. Boyd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
517 F. App'x 138 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Brown v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:KEITH MICHAEL BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. BOYD, Officer, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

517 F. App'x 138 (4th Cir. 2013)