From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Berumen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2023
2:21-cv-2187-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2187-TLN-AC

09-27-2023

JONATHAN Q. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. S. BERUMEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 12, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued September 12, 2023 (ECF No. 27) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Brown v. Berumen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2023
2:21-cv-2187-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Brown v. Berumen

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN Q. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. S. BERUMEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-2187-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)