From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Berumen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 27, 2022
2:21-cv-2187 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2187 AC P

10-27-2022

JONATHAN Q. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. S. BERUMEN, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendant S. Berumen retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights. On October 25, 2022, defendants filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR Project. ECF No. 19. After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to opt out (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED and the stay of this action is LIFTED, and

2. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Brown v. Berumen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 27, 2022
2:21-cv-2187 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. Berumen

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN Q. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. S. BERUMEN, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-2187 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2022)