From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Beagley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2011
1:10-CV-01460-OWW-JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

1:10-CV-01460-OWW-JLT Doc. 20

08-29-2011

BENNIE RAY BROWN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER JESS BEAGLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AS MOOT

On July 12, 2011, Plaintiff Bennie Ray Brown ("Plaintiff") filed a "motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 sections (a) (1)(2)(3)(5) and Rules 26 and 56," (Doc. 20) which Defendants opposed on July 27, 2011. (Doc. 21). Plaintiff appears to argue the merits of the action while seeking a pretrial conference for the Court to set appropriate deadlines. However, on June 21, 2011, a Rule 26 scheduling conference was set in the matter. (Doc. 19).

Because a scheduling conference is currently set before the Court, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Beagley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2011
1:10-CV-01460-OWW-JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Beagley

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE RAY BROWN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER JESS BEAGLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

1:10-CV-01460-OWW-JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)