From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Baudino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2019
Case No. CV 15-8924-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-8924-FMO (JEM)

10-25-2019

STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY BAUDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion to for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: October 25, 2019

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Baudino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2019
Case No. CV 15-8924-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. Baudino

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY BAUDINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 15-8924-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2019)