From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Feb 28, 2008
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00136-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00136-MP-AK.

February 28, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1); however, no objections were filed, and the time for doing so has passed.

The Court agrees that substantial evidence existed to find that the claimant's complaints of pain did not comport with the objective medical evidence. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The Decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed.
DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Brown v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Feb 28, 2008
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00136-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:HENRY BROWN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, JO ANNE B BARNHART, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00136-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2008)