From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Amityville Plaza Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1994
210 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, and upon reargument, so much of the order dated October 26, 1992, as denied the branch of the appellant's motion which was to dismiss the third-party complaint is vacated, that branch of the motion is granted, and the third-party complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly tripped over a raised sidewalk located in the Village of Amityville (hereinafter the Village) and commenced this action against the abutting landowner, Amityville Plaza Associates, which in turn, commenced a third-party action against the Village. The Village thereafter moved, inter alia, for dismissal of the third-party complaint on the ground that it had not received prior written notice of the sidewalk condition as required by Village Law § 6-628.

The Supreme Court denied the branch of the Village's motion which was to dismiss the third-party complaint. Upon reargument, the court adhered to its original determination. We reverse.

Village Law § 6-628 provides, inter alia, that in order to maintain an action against a village for injuries sustained as a consequence of a defective sidewalk, written notice of the defect must have been filed with the Village Clerk (see, Misek-Falkoff v Village of Pleasantville, 207 A.D.2d 332). Here, it is undisputed that the Village did not receive prior written notice of the sidewalk condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff's injury.

Moreover, while prior written notice is not required where the municipality is affirmatively negligent in creating the alleged condition (see, Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 N.Y.2d 917), there is nothing in the record establishing that the third-party defendant Village affirmatively created the alleged defect (see, Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 A.D.2d 670, 671). Under these circumstances, the third-party complaint must be dismissed (see, Misek-Falkoff v Village of Pleasantville, supra; Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, supra). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Bracken and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Amityville Plaza Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1994
210 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Brown v. Amityville Plaza Associates

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE V. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. AMITYVILLE PLAZA ASSOCIATES, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 120

Citing Cases

Cannon v. Incorporated Village of Lindenhurst

Here, it is undisputed that the Village did not receive prior written notice of the street condition which…