From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Adams

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 20, 2024
5:24-cv-00065-MTT-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00065-MTT-CHW

03-20-2024

MARCUS LAMAR BROWN, Petitioner, v. ROBERT ADAMS, Respondent.


ORDER

Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge

Petitioner Marcus Lamar Brown, who is currently confined in the Jenkins Correctional Center in Millen, Georgia, has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Pet. for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1. Petitioner has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in this action in forma pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel. Mot. to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 2; Mot. to Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 4.

As to the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Petitioner's account transaction statement shows that Petitioner had average monthly deposits of $284.33 to his account in the six months before the petition was filed. The filing fee in a habeas corpus case is only $5.00. Because Petitioner's documents suggest that he can pre-pay the filing fee, Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this order to pay the $5.00 filing fee.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of Petitioner's habeas corpus petition. If, however, Petitioner's financial circumstances have changed and he no longer has funds to pay the amount required, Petitioner may - in lieu of payment - file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an updated prisoner account statement. In filing a renewed motion, Petitioner must fully explain why he cannot pay the $5.00.

As to the motion for the appointment of counsel, Petitioner asserts that he is illiterate and unable to obtain records that are needed to develop his claims. Mot. to Appoint Counsel 1, ECF No. 4. Generally, there is no right to legal representation in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992). Appointment of counsel is required in a habeas action if counsel is necessary for effective utilization of discovery procedures or if an evidentiary hearing is required. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rules 6(a) and 8(c). Appointed counsel is also required if the petition is a death row inmate pursuing federal habeas corpus relief. See, e.g., McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 854 (1994). The Court is not yet able to determine whether counsel needs to be appointed in this case. Therefore, Petitioner's motion is DENIED. If it becomes apparent at some point later in these proceedings that counsel should be appointed for Petitioner, the Court, on its own motion, will consider assisting him in securing legal counsel at that time. Consequently, there is no need for Plaintiff to file additional requests for counsel.

There shall be no service of process in this case until further order of the Court.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Brown v. Adams

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 20, 2024
5:24-cv-00065-MTT-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Brown v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS LAMAR BROWN, Petitioner, v. ROBERT ADAMS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Mar 20, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-00065-MTT-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2024)